Research paper says women do not contribute as much as men and are useless

Xangsane

Xangsane

jova
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Posts
132,068
Reputation
108,343
1705073280120
 
Over for foidcels
 
Good morning


I hate women
 
flippasav said:
Thoughts on this?

looksmax.org

Pornstar actress insane ascension (Pics)

Valentina Jewels (Latina P star) Another proof women live life on easy mode This was mostly done by fillermaxxing Before: (Empathetic oofy doofy latina female with a nice personality) After: (Cold ass bitch from Miami who dealt with heartbreak and lives rent free in your incel head)...
looksmax.org looksmax.org
Click to expand...
trashy


contributed the most ACE (Dorian, Humberto, Jerry, and Lorenzo)


ALL MALE BTW
 
  • JFL
Reactions: flippasav
Women are useless pigs, who would’ve guessed.
 
Water even outside the black pill. Civilization would crumble without men, even normies know this on some level.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: lowtiernormiechad, thereallegend and latincell95
  • +1
Reactions: flippasav
latincell95 said:
Sames as IRL tbh. Women at the end of their lifetimes have a negative fiscal impact, somewhere around -$122,000
Click to expand...
coloringisprophecy3 said:
they are uslesss outside of sex
Click to expand...
kanderior said:
they fulfill important roles in strong, healthy and traditional patriarchal societies.
Click to expand...
JFL at their contributions
Xangsane said:
contributed the most ACE (Dorian, Humberto, Jerry, and Lorenzo)


ALL MALE BTW
Click to expand...
Compare Gabrielle (4.1%) with the top three males
1705074088338
 
  • JFL
Reactions: latincell95
Pls rope bitch
 
Schizo thread
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Xangsane
Take away foid rights and autonomy in a video game and re-establish androcentrism
 
hirochan said:
Take away foid rights and autonomy in a video game and re-establish androcentrism
Click to expand...
Zenis said:
Water thread
Click to expand...
Autistic Badboy said:
The article you got that graph from.
Click to expand...
coloringisprophecy3 said:
no they don’t. they are nothing but pigs.
Click to expand...
kanderior said:
Water even outside the black pill. Civilization would crumble without men, even normies know this on some level.
Click to expand...
Even ethnic males (Humberto) contribute more than white females (Gabrielle)
1705075489510
 
They are only good for giving holes
 
flippasav said:
Good morning


I hate women
Click to expand...
adam_ross2549 said:
wow!! women dont do as much as men who wouldve known.
Click to expand...
marek937 said:
They are only good for giving holes
Click to expand...
hirochan said:
Take away foid rights and autonomy in a video game and re-establish androcentrism
Click to expand...
hirochan said:
Take away foid rights and autonomy in a video game and re-establish androcentrism
Click to expand...
Autistic Badboy said:
The article you got that graph from.
Click to expand...
Zenis said:
Water thread
Click to expand...
Yaarhuni said:
Pls rope bitch
Click to expand...
coloringisprophecy3 said:
they are uslesss outside of sex
Click to expand...
kanderior said:
Water even outside the black pill. Civilization would crumble without men, even normies know this on some level.
Click to expand...
latincell95 said:
Sames as IRL tbh. Women at the end of their lifetimes have a negative fiscal impact, somewhere around -$122,000
Click to expand...

  1. Dominance and Influence: The chart shows "Dorian" with the largest percentage, which could symbolically represent the dominant personality or the most influential individual in a group. In a group dynamic, there may be one individual who takes charge or whose contributions overshadow the others.
  2. Group Dynamics: With varying percentages, the chart could reflect the dynamics within a group of individuals, indicating that some are more active and others less so. It might hint at underlying reasons why some individuals contribute more than others—perhaps due to personality traits, levels of enthusiasm, or external encouragement.
  3. Inequality of Contribution: The stark contrast between the largest and smallest contributions might symbolize the disparity in effort or engagement among the individuals involved. This could raise questions about fairness, recognition, and reward systems.
  4. Recognition and Visibility: The smallest segments, with names such as "Olga" and "Imelda," might represent individuals who feel overlooked or undervalued. In a psychoanalytic setting, this might prompt a discussion about the need for recognition and the feeling of being seen and appreciated.
  5. The Need for Balance: From a psychoanalytic perspective, one might interpret the need for a more balanced distribution of effort. The chart could symbolize an individual's or group's unconscious drive towards creating a more egalitarian or balanced structure where contributions are more evenly spread.

-

The pie chart represents the contributions of 10-year-old children to a task. The names on the chart likely correspond to individual children, and the percentages represent their respective contributions to the task.

From a behavioral standpoint, and assuming the names correspond traditionally to genders (though this is not always accurate and gender cannot always be inferred from names):

  • "Dorian," representing the largest segment with 37.0%, could be seen as a leader or someone who takes initiative. This child may have a more assertive personality, a strong sense of responsibility, or simply a higher level of interest in the task.
  • "Lorenzo," with 23.5%, also appears to be a significant contributor, which might indicate a similar drive and willingness to participate actively. This child might also possess leadership qualities or feel motivated to contribute substantially.
  • Names with smaller percentages, such as "Rebekah," "Fernand," "Nestor," "Erin," "Chantal," "Andrea," "Olga," and "Imelda," suggest a lesser degree of involvement in the task. This could be for a variety of reasons, such as differing levels of interest in the task, natural shyness, or the possibility that they were not given as much opportunity to contribute more significantly.
  • The children with the smallest percentages, such as "Imelda" with 0.1%, might have faced obstacles to contributing more, or they might be more reserved, less confident, or less interested in the activity. They might also be the ones who need more encouragement or support to participate.
In terms of gender behavior, which can be a sensitive and complex topic due to the variations and overlaps in personality traits across all genders:

  • Boys (assuming names like "Dorian," "Lorenzo," "Fernand," etc., traditionally correspond to boys) in this chart seem to be taking up larger portions, which might suggest they were either more engaged, or perhaps felt more confident in this particular task, or it could reflect a dynamic where they were more assertive in their involvement.
  • Girls (assuming names like "Rebekah," "Erin," "Chantal," etc., traditionally correspond to girls) are represented across a range of contributions, with some being very active and others less so. This could reflect individual personality differences, social dynamics, or the nature of the task itself.

-

  • A child like "Dorian," who contributed 37.0%, might be seen as highly engaged or motivated by the task. However, this high percentage could also suggest a possibility of competitive behavior or a desire for approval from authority figures.
  • "Lorenzo," contributing 23.5%, could indicate a cooperative spirit and a strong work ethic. Yet, it could also reflect an inclination to follow when a strong leader takes the initiative.
  • Children with mid-range contributions, such as "Humberto," "Jerry," and "Gabrielle," might indicate a more balanced approach to participation, possibly blending in with group dynamics and contributing as part of the team.
  • The children contributing smaller percentages, from "Rebekah" down to "Imelda," might suggest various scenarios: perhaps these children are more reserved, or they could be facing challenges in expressing their ideas within the group. They may also be content with smaller roles or might require more encouragement to participate fully.
  • For children with the smallest contributions, such as "Olga" and "Imelda," it's possible that they might feel overshadowed by more dominant personalities, or they may not feel as confident in their abilities relating to the task. Alternatively, they might simply have a different set of interests or a different style of engaging with group activities.

-


  • Dorian (37.0%)    : This child may have a strong sense of leadership and responsibility. The high percentage could indicate a dominant personality, confidence, or a high level of motivation. Dorian might enjoy the recognition that comes with achievement or could be driven by a genuine passion for the task.
  • Lorenzo (23.5%): Lorenzo's significant contribution suggests a robust work ethic and a willingness to be involved. This child might be a reliable team player who is comfortable taking initiative but does not feel the need to be in the spotlight, as much as the top contributor.
  • Humberto (11.5%): With a moderate contribution, Humberto might represent the middle ground between leadership and support roles. This could indicate adaptability and a collaborative nature. Humberto may be someone who contributes steadily but doesn't push to outshine others.
  • Jerry (7.1%): Jerry’s contributions, while not as substantial as the top three, are still notable. This might suggest that Jerry is engaged and willing to participate but may prefer to contribute in a more measured way, possibly due to a more reflective nature or less competitive drive.
  • Gabrielle (4.4%): Gabrielle’s involvement, being in the top five but with a smaller percentage, might indicate a child who is active and contributes but perhaps is more reserved or takes time to warm up to the task. Gabrielle may also be someone who contributes in more subtle ways, or who may need more encouragement to share their ideas freely.

-

  1. Rebekah (0.7%): With a smaller percentage, Rebekah might be someone who is more reserved or perhaps hesitant to assert herself in group settings. This could also indicate a preference for observing rather than participating, or it could reflect a lack of interest or confidence in the task.
  2. Fernand (0.5%): Fernand’s contribution could suggest that he is either less engaged with the task or possibly that he is overshadowed by more assertive individuals in the group. There might also be external factors limiting his ability to contribute more significantly.
  3. Nestor (0.4%): A contribution like Nestor’s might indicate a child who is either content with playing a minor role or who may struggle with the task at hand. It could also reflect a child who needs more individual support or encouragement to participate fully.
  4. Olga (0.2%): Olga’s minimal contribution could imply that she is either reluctant to participate or faces challenges in the group dynamic. This could be due to a variety of factors, including personal interests, social dynamics, or simply the way the activity was structured.
  5. Imelda (0.1%): With the smallest visible contribution, Imelda might be the most reserved or introverted member of the group, or she might not feel included or encouraged within the group setting. This could also reflect a lack of opportunity to contribute or possible distractions during the task.

-

Gender Group Analysis:

Boys (Assuming traditional gender associations with names like Fernand, Nestor, etc.): The boys are represented across the spectrum of contributions. Those with higher contributions could be seen as more assertive or engaged, while those with lower contributions might be less inclined to take initiative, or might not have felt as comfortable participating in this particular task. It's also possible that boys in the lower contribution bracket might engage differently with tasks or in group dynamics.

Girls (Assuming traditional gender associations with names like Rebekah, Olga, etc.): The girls also span a range of contribution levels. The lower percentages might suggest a variety of engagement levels and could reflect a multitude of personal and social factors. Girls with smaller contributions could be equally capable but possibly less forthcoming in group participation, or they may express their engagement in less visible ways.
 
 
Enslave all women
 
They still raise children and birth them
You came out of one
There are almost no single fathers vs single mothers
Freixel said:
Enslave all women
Click to expand...
every single day i watch you deteriorate more and more
 
ShawarmaFilth said:
They still raise children and birth them
You came out of one
There are almost no single fathers vs single mothers

every single day i watch you deteriorate more and more
Click to expand...
Why do you say that bro?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

vermillioncorefan
who says u can’t be incel if u have a gf
Replies
2
Views
74
vermillioncorefan
vermillioncorefan
Eternal_
Blackpill Women hate most men so much that they deliberately deprive these men of their youth
Replies
15
Views
380
Chadeep
Chadeep
theonewhocantascend
Serious Do redheads like blonde men?
Replies
22
Views
173
AlbinoMaxxer
AlbinoMaxxer
AlexAP
Serious Women make the first move?
Replies
11
Views
160
MostGLSlayer
MostGLSlayer
disillusioned
Over I'm beginning to hate men more than foids
Replies
20
Views
393
disillusioned
disillusioned

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top